Ir al contenido principal

Biden in Africa.

Too little, too late?

U.S. president Joe Biden has departed for Luanda, Angola with the mission of promoting a railway project called “The Lobito Corridor” that connects the port city of Lobito with the city of Ndola, capital of the Copperbelt province in Zambia. The project is not actually new, but an improved version of a railway originally designed and constructed between the first three decades of the the twentieth century, during the Belgian rule of the neighboring country Democratic Republic of Congo, formerly known as the Belgian Congo. At that time, Angola was under the dominance of the Portuguese Monarchy.

Mr. Biden is promoting now a project that was, in fact, promoted before by other powerful nations with interests in the region. It was once sponsored by the Portuguese and Belgian Monarchies, then by the Chinese foray in the African continent that begun after the independence in the seventies and now by the Americans. Apparently, the visit is part of an intention to regain some leverage for the United States in a region that has been recently dominated by Chinese investment and even Russian military presence throughout the continent.

Originally known as the Benguela railway, it passes trough cities such as Huambo, formerly Nova Lisboa, it was completed in 1928 but seriously damaged and even disrupted as a consequence of the Civil War between 1975-2002. It was rebounded by the Chinese after the Civil War came to an end, but, according to a Wall Street Journal video material posted in the project website, in such a poor way that the authorities have decided to trust an European-led, American-funded consortium for the reconstruction of the project.

Map taken from Lobito Corridor website.

Based on The New York Times reporting on the matter, when Angola emerged from its decades long Civil War in 2002, Goverment oficials asked for help: China said yes, but United States said no. However, Thanks to the favaouring of Angola’s President João Lourenço of American interests in the region since taking office in 2017, it has now paid off with Mr. Biden choosing his country for a last minute visit to the only Sub Saharan country ever visited during his tenure.

The project is part of a broader strategy to secure access to raw and strategic materials whose main sources are located in the heart of Africa. Called “Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment”, it was launched last year in Japan at the G7 Summit. It has been considered as the United States counter balance of the China-led “Belt and Road Initiative”. Reporting by both The New York Times and Deutsche Welle mentioned consistent views offered by experts in the sense that the reconstruction of the American industries promised by the Make America Great Again president-elect Donald Trump would badly require those raw materials provided by countries such as Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Angola and Tanzania. Yet, it’s not clear whether the American initiative can compete with decades-long China presence in the region materialized in projects such as the Tazara railway that connects Kapiri Mposhi with Dar es Salaam.

Taken from DW article “Joe Bidens letzte Auslandsreise führt nach Angola”

The Lobito poject looks like a win win investment not just for United States and European interests but also for China because of the high stakes of its interests in Angola. Questions is, will it bring any long-term benefit for the people of Angola?

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

News Roundup.

Brief summary of the most recent press coverage from my standpoint.  The election of Donald Trump as new president of the United States is still sending waves of reactions around most of media outlets. In the colombian outlet El Tiempo historian Eduardo Posada Carbó wrote an opinion colum on October 31st called "Fears without Hopes" that commented on the last two numbers of the outlet The Atlantic, which promotes views that are friendly to the ones of the Democratic Party and opposed to the so called MAGA movement. The outlet officially endorsed Kamala Harris campaing in november and ran a quite sinister cover in October that, according to Posada Carbó, refers to Trump. Then, the historian went on again on November 7th with the colum Democracy, in problems where without tackling specifically the elections in USA, handles the topic of how disenchantment with  democracy as a political system is spreading around the world opening the doors for figures such as Trump. The New ...

Reseña de Arana, B., Moreno, B. d., Arenas, J. R., & Renza, M. (Edits.). (2024). Cartografía verbal del odio en Colombia. Un manual para desarmar las palabras. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

      Reseña El libro es una creación colectiva a cargo de 36 autores y 4 curadores quienes han logrado una unidad de contenido. Se trata de un compendio de palabras, expresiones y usos del lenguaje local que evidencian dinámicas de violencia y desigualdad presentes en la sociedad colombiana contemporánea. Esta unidad de contenido, sin embargo, no se evidencia en el tratamiento del tema. Mientras algunas entradas proponen una perspectiva genealogista apelando al origen semántico o sintáctico del término, otros lo hacen más a la manera del folclorólogo que compila usos y costumbres e incluso a la manera del etnólogo que describe un intercambio personal.  Ello deriva en una impresión abigarrada que se acentúa debido a la decisión editorial de no atribuir la autoría específica de cada texto al autor respectivo. El libro se organiza por entradas agrupadas temáticamente en secciones que son denominadas de manera alegórica. Esto tiene sentido pues permite darle ciert...

Lehder, C. (2024). Vida y muerte del Cartel de Medellín. Debate.

  El texto escrito por el Carlos Lehder presenta un estilo sencillo y directo que lo hace de fácil lectura. En sus poco más de 400 páginas se percibe la voz de un hombre arrepentido de sus acciones que, sin embargo, todavía ensaya argumentos para justificar sus acciones como en el caso de su oposición a la extradición a finales de la década de 1980 y principios de 1990. Además, insiste a lo largo del libro en un contraste con la figura de Pablo Escobar que le permite mostrar sus acciones como menos dañinas y sangrientas que las del capo antioqueño.  El libro se acomoda perfectamente en el amplio catálogo de memorabilia publicado al rededor del Cartel de Medellín. Por su estilo y argumento está dirigido a un amplio público que no juzga sino que apenas se fascina con la temeridad de las acciones desplegadas por personajes como Escobar, Lehder y otros. Sin embargo, el autor reviste unas características que lo hacen un tanto excéntrico en este paisaje. Lejos de ser un joven empobr...